linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] net: rfkill: gpio: remove gpio conversion support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:02:19 +0200
From:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] net: rfkill: gpio: remove gpio conversion support

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 05:47:38PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> On 11/25/2013 05:41 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> >Adding the lookup table in first patch and then changing the driver in
> >the second creates a point to the history where this driver stops
> >working on this platform, which is something I'm not willing to do.
> 
> Does it? If you just add a lookup table and keep using the
> integer-based GPIO interface, then your lookup table will not be
> used by anyone and will basically be a no-op. Then you can switch to
> the GPIO descriptor interface and take advantage of the lookup
> table. Unless I missed something there should not be any point that
> breaks in the git history.
> 
> (to be clear: the first patch should *only* contain the lookup
> table, and the second be a merge of the current patches 1 and 3 of
> this series.)

OK, I agree. If I don't remove the old gpio numbers in in the first
patch, there is no problem. We can do this with the two patches.

Thanks,


-- 
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/