linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: s5pv210: Frequency lock should be considered in hibernation also.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:46:43 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...il.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: s5pv210: Frequency lock should be considered
 in hibernation also.

On 25 November 2013 19:08, Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...il.com> wrote:
> The Frequency lock value should be higher or same than the booting frequency,
> which is set by the bootloader. To eliminate possible inconsistency
> in frequency, we save and restore frequency during suspend & resume
> and disable CPUFREQ activity. This should be considered in hibernation also.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/s5pv210-cpufreq.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Hi,

Can you please test this patchset:

[PATCH V3 0/6] cpufreq: suspend early/resume late

Then, we wouldn't require the routine you modified and hence
your patchset :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/