lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:41:27 +0200
From:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Cc:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] net: rfkill: gpio: remove gpio conversion support

On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 05:59:30PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Wouldn't it be possible (and simpler) to move patch 2 of your series
> to first position, and then to merge patch 1 and 3 together in second
> position? It seems to me that you are basically undoing much of the
> work of your first patch here (notably by removing
> rfkill_gpio_convert_to_desc() which ends up having a very short life)
> and that this could be avoided if you defined the platform lookup
> tables first.
> 
> Doing so would avoid prevent you from using gpio_to_desc() which you
> should never ever use anyway. :P

Adding the lookup table in first patch and then changing the driver in
the second creates a point to the history where this driver stops
working on this platform, which is something I'm not willing to do.

But, we can make one patch out of all three if everybody is OK with
that.

-- 
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ