linux-kernel - Re: Re: modules, add_kallsyms() && DEFINE_PER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:02:57 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: Re: modules, add_kallsyms() && DEFINE_PER_CPU

(2013/11/27 22:35), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/27, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>
>> (2013/11/27 2:50), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> On 11/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Note: this doesn't work for modules, but module's per-cpu data is
>>>> not visible for kallsyms_lookup_name() anyway.
>>>
>>> Rusty, I am just curious if it makes sense to change this or not...
>>>
>>> But DEFINE_PER_CPU'ed symbols are ignored by add_kallsyms(). I guess
>>> this is because is_core_symbol() requires "sh_flags & SHF_ALLOC".
>>> And probably because of INIT_OFFSET_MASK.
>>
>> Oleg, I think you can do it by using is_module_percpu_address(). :)
> 
> Not only is_module_percpu_address() can't help. We can solve the
> is-it-percpu problem (although the check won't be cheap).

I think you can do this at registering phase (by adding a flag
in symbol_cache). That is in a slow path.

> The problem is, sc->addr is always NULL if DEFINE_PER_CPU() was used
> in a module. kallsyms_lookup_name() can never see it because it is
> ignored by add_kallsyms(), it is nacked by is_core_symbol().
>
> IOW, with or without this patch @modular_percpu_sym never reads the
> memory.

Hmm, in that case, should we support it? It looks non-existed
symbol is given. I think until the module.c support per-cpu in
kallsyms, we can delay to support it. I mean we can do 3 steps
1. support percpu symbol in the kernel except for drivers
2. update module.c to store the percpu symbols into kallsyms.
3. support percpu symbol in module .


Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/