linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/4] sched: remove cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue,  3 Dec 2013 17:05:52 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To:	mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, linux@....linux.org.uk, tony.luck@...el.com,
	fenghua.yu@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, arjan@...ux.intel.com, pjt@...gle.com,
	fengguang.wu@...el.com
Cc:	james.hogan@...tec.com, alex.shi@...aro.org, jason.low2@...com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] sched: remove cpu_load decay

The cpu_load decays on time according past cpu load of rq. New sched_avg decays on tasks' load of time. Now we has 2 kind decay for cpu_load. That is a kind of redundancy. And increase the system load in sched_tick etc.

This patch removes the cpu_load decay. 

There are 5 load_idx used for cpu_load in sched_domain. busy_idx and idle_idx are not zero usually, but newidle_idx, wake_idx and forkexec_idx are all zero on every arch. A shortcut to remove cpu_Load decay in the first patch. just one line patch for this change. :)

I have tested the patchset on my pandaES board, 2 cores ARM Cortex A9.
hackbench thread/pipe performance increased nearly 8% with this patchset!

	latest kernel 527d1511310a89		+ this patchset
hackbench -T -g 10 -f 40
	23.25"					21.7"
	23.16"					19.99"
	24.24"					21.53"
hackbench -p -g 10 -f 40
	26.52"					22.48"
	23.89"					24.00"
	25.65"					23.06"
hackbench -P -g 10 -f 40
	20.14"					19.37"
	19.96"					19.76"
	21.76"					21.54"

Daniel tested this patchset on his Core2 2 socket server, the hackbench has no clear regression/improvement.
This patchset is also in Fengguang's x86 testing for more than 1 week, and no regression report until now. 
Fengguang, could I assume there is no regression on Intel platforms? :)

The git tree for this patchset at:
 git@...hub.com:alexshi/power-scheduling.git no-load-idx 

--
Thanks
	Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/