lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 3 Dec 2013 13:12:47 -0500
From:	Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chun-Yeow Yeoh <yeohchunyeow@...il.com>,
	Bob Copeland <bob@...ybit.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with the
 wireless tree

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:09:43PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > diff --cc net/mac80211/util.c
> > > index 9f9b9bd3fd44,06265d7f8cc3..000000000000
> > > --- a/net/mac80211/util.c
> > > +++ b/net/mac80211/util.c
> > > @@@ -2457,9 -2481,13 +2479,8 @@@ int ieee80211_send_action_csa(struct ie
> > >                         WLAN_EID_CHAN_SWITCH_PARAM_TX_RESTRICT : 0x00;
> > >               put_unaligned_le16(WLAN_REASON_MESH_CHAN, pos); /* Reason Cd */
> > >               pos += 2;
> > > -             pre_value = cpu_to_le16(ifmsh->pre_value);
> > > -             memcpy(pos, &pre_value, 2);             /* Precedence Value */
> > >  -            if (!ifmsh->pre_value)
> > >  -                    ifmsh->pre_value = 1;
> > >  -            else
> > >  -                    ifmsh->pre_value++;
> > > +             put_unaligned_le16(ifmsh->pre_value, pos);/* Precedence Value */
> > >               pos += 2;
> > >  -            ifmsh->chsw_init = true;
> > >       }
> > >
> > >       ieee80211_tx_skb(sdata, skb);


> I think the above is correct, the pre_value assignment with 1/++ and
> chsw_init moved into another function in Bob's patch. Bob?

The quoted resolution looks right to me.  But, I think the patch
in question was actually Chun-yeow's so I'm not sure my opinion
counts :)

-- 
Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ