| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:20:01 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 3/8] mm, mempolicy: remove per-process flag
PF_MEMPOLICY is an unnecessary optimization for CONFIG_SLAB users.
There's no significant performance degradation to checking
current->mempolicy rather than current->flags & PF_MEMPOLICY in the
allocation path, especially since this is considered unlikely().
Per-process flags are a scarce resource so we should free them up
whenever possible and make them available. We'll be using it shortly for
memcg oom reserves.
Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
---
include/linux/mempolicy.h | 5 -----
include/linux/sched.h | 1 -
kernel/fork.c | 1 -
mm/mempolicy.c | 31 -------------------------------
mm/slab.c | 4 ++--
5 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mempolicy.h b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
--- a/include/linux/mempolicy.h
+++ b/include/linux/mempolicy.h
@@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ extern void numa_policy_init(void);
extern void mpol_rebind_task(struct task_struct *tsk, const nodemask_t *new,
enum mpol_rebind_step step);
extern void mpol_rebind_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t *new);
-extern void mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(struct task_struct *p);
extern struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags,
@@ -266,10 +265,6 @@ static inline void mpol_rebind_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t *new)
{
}
-static inline void mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(struct task_struct *p)
-{
-}
-
static inline struct zonelist *huge_zonelist(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long addr, gfp_t gfp_flags,
struct mempolicy **mpol, nodemask_t **nodemask)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1695,7 +1695,6 @@ extern void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t *ut,
#define PF_SPREAD_SLAB 0x02000000 /* Spread some slab caches over cpuset */
#define PF_NO_SETAFFINITY 0x04000000 /* Userland is not allowed to meddle with cpus_allowed */
#define PF_MCE_EARLY 0x08000000 /* Early kill for mce process policy */
-#define PF_MEMPOLICY 0x10000000 /* Non-default NUMA mempolicy */
#define PF_MUTEX_TESTER 0x20000000 /* Thread belongs to the rt mutex tester */
#define PF_FREEZER_SKIP 0x40000000 /* Freezer should not count it as freezable */
#define PF_SUSPEND_TASK 0x80000000 /* this thread called freeze_processes and should not be frozen */
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1261,7 +1261,6 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(unsigned long clone_flags,
p->mempolicy = NULL;
goto bad_fork_cleanup_cgroup;
}
- mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(p);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CPUSETS
p->cpuset_mem_spread_rotor = NUMA_NO_NODE;
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -796,36 +796,6 @@ static int mbind_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start,
return err;
}
-/*
- * Update task->flags PF_MEMPOLICY bit: set iff non-default
- * mempolicy. Allows more rapid checking of this (combined perhaps
- * with other PF_* flag bits) on memory allocation hot code paths.
- *
- * If called from outside this file, the task 'p' should -only- be
- * a newly forked child not yet visible on the task list, because
- * manipulating the task flags of a visible task is not safe.
- *
- * The above limitation is why this routine has the funny name
- * mpol_fix_fork_child_flag().
- *
- * It is also safe to call this with a task pointer of current,
- * which the static wrapper mpol_set_task_struct_flag() does,
- * for use within this file.
- */
-
-void mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- if (p->mempolicy)
- p->flags |= PF_MEMPOLICY;
- else
- p->flags &= ~PF_MEMPOLICY;
-}
-
-static void mpol_set_task_struct_flag(void)
-{
- mpol_fix_fork_child_flag(current);
-}
-
/* Set the process memory policy */
static long do_set_mempolicy(unsigned short mode, unsigned short flags,
nodemask_t *nodes)
@@ -862,7 +832,6 @@ static long do_set_mempolicy(unsigned short mode, unsigned short flags,
}
old = current->mempolicy;
current->mempolicy = new;
- mpol_set_task_struct_flag();
if (new && new->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE &&
nodes_weight(new->v.nodes))
current->il_next = first_node(new->v.nodes);
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -3027,7 +3027,7 @@ out:
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
/*
- * Try allocating on another node if PF_SPREAD_SLAB|PF_MEMPOLICY.
+ * Try allocating on another node if PF_SPREAD_SLAB is a mempolicy is set.
*
* If we are in_interrupt, then process context, including cpusets and
* mempolicy, may not apply and should not be used for allocation policy.
@@ -3259,7 +3259,7 @@ __do_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cache, gfp_t flags)
{
void *objp;
- if (unlikely(current->flags & (PF_SPREAD_SLAB | PF_MEMPOLICY))) {
+ if (current->mempolicy || unlikely(current->flags & PF_SPREAD_SLAB)) {
objp = alternate_node_alloc(cache, flags);
if (objp)
goto out;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists