linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2 V1] arm-mmp-build-sram-driver-alone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:17:14 -0800
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	Qiao Zhou <zhouqiao@...vell.com>
Cc:	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
	Miao Eric <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dmaengine@...r.kernel.org" <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chao Xie <cxie4@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 V1] arm-mmp-build-sram-driver-alone

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Qiao Zhou <zhouqiao@...vell.com> wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 07:17 PM, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>>
>> Dan indicated that you could pack these two patches into one. Whatever
>> it's also OK to use two patches.
>
> Misunderstood it... Thanks for correcting.
>

Please combine the patches for two reasons:
1/ patch1 by itself makes the problem worse it prevents the mmp_tdma
driver from building even if CPU_MMP2 is selected.
2/ patch2 does not have a changelog and is the only user of the
enabling in patch1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/