linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] PCI: Double removing fix and allocate 64bit mmio pref

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:03:49 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...il.com>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
	Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] PCI: Double removing fix and allocate 64bit mmio pref

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...il.com> wrote:
> Would you please consider *not* bundling unrelated, or at least
> non-dependent, patches together in one series.  As a distrobution
> subsystem maintainer, this type of bundling really complicates trying
> to identify and isolate key material for bringing in.  It also makes
> trying to identify the core content for key fixes, which can occur
> many months or years later, significantly more difficult when they
> were buried within a series with other unrelated content

ok.

Will resend them in three patchset.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/