linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] timekeeping: Fix clock stability with nohz

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 7 Dec 2013 18:56:11 +0100
From:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:	Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] timekeeping: Fix clock stability with nohz

On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 05:43:45PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> Anyway, let me know what you think and I'll run some tests on it this
> weekend.
> 
> thanks
> -john
> 
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> index 3abf534..bfb36fd 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
> @@ -1056,42 +1056,24 @@ static __always_inline int
> timekeeping_bigadjust(struct timekeeper *tk,
>                           s64 *offset)

John,

Any chance of posting this against a normal kernel?  I am preparing
"real" tests comparing the three different patches in this thread on
v3.12.3, but this one does not apply.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/