| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:11:54 +0800
From: Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@...wei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] proc: change return values while get_proc_task err
While getting proc task error, it shoule return -ESRCH.
Signed-off-by: Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@...wei.com>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
fs/proc/fd.c | 8 +++++---
fs/proc/namespaces.c | 12 ++++++++----
fs/proc_namespace.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 1485e38..65f78a9 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -174,9 +174,10 @@ static int get_task_root(struct task_struct *task, struct path *root)
static int proc_cwd_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct path *path)
{
struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(dentry->d_inode);
- int result = -ENOENT;
+ int result = -ESRCH;
if (task) {
+ result = -ENOENT;
task_lock(task);
if (task->fs) {
get_fs_pwd(task->fs, path);
@@ -191,7 +192,7 @@ static int proc_cwd_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct path *path)
static int proc_root_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct path *path)
{
struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(dentry->d_inode);
- int result = -ENOENT;
+ int result = -ESRCH;
if (task) {
result = get_task_root(task, path);
@@ -1438,11 +1439,11 @@ static int proc_exe_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct path *exe_path)
task = get_proc_task(dentry->d_inode);
if (!task)
- return -ENOENT;
+ return -ECHILD;
mm = get_task_mm(task);
put_task_struct(task);
if (!mm)
- return -ENOENT;
+ return -EINVAL;
exe_file = get_mm_exe_file(mm);
mmput(mm);
if (exe_file) {
@@ -1799,11 +1800,12 @@ static int proc_map_files_get_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct path *path)
struct mm_struct *mm;
int rc;
- rc = -ENOENT;
+ rc = -ESRCH;
task = get_proc_task(dentry->d_inode);
if (!task)
goto out;
+ rc = -EINVAL;
mm = get_task_mm(task);
put_task_struct(task);
if (!mm)
@@ -1934,7 +1936,7 @@ proc_map_files_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
goto out;
- ret = -ENOENT;
+ ret = -ESRCH;
task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
if (!task)
goto out;
@@ -2161,11 +2163,12 @@ static struct dentry *proc_pident_lookup(struct inode *dir,
struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(dir);
const struct pid_entry *p, *last;
- error = -ENOENT;
+ error = -ESRCH;
if (!task)
goto out_no_task;
+ error = -ENOENT;
/*
* Yes, it does not scale. And it should not. Don't add
* new entries into /proc/<tgid>/ without very good reasons.
@@ -2194,7 +2197,7 @@ static int proc_pident_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx,
const struct pid_entry *p;
if (!task)
- return -ENOENT;
+ return -ESRCH;
if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx))
goto out;
@@ -3047,8 +3050,10 @@ static struct dentry *proc_task_lookup(struct inode *dir, struct dentry * dentry
unsigned tid;
struct pid_namespace *ns;
- if (!leader)
+ if (!leader) {
+ result = -ESRCH;
goto out_no_task;
+ }
tid = name_to_int(dentry);
if (tid == ~0U)
@@ -3152,7 +3157,7 @@ static int proc_task_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
int tid;
if (!task)
- return -ENOENT;
+ return -ESRCH;
rcu_read_lock();
if (pid_alive(task)) {
leader = task->group_leader;
diff --git a/fs/proc/fd.c b/fs/proc/fd.c
index 985ea88..0369cbc 100644
--- a/fs/proc/fd.c
+++ b/fs/proc/fd.c
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ static int seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
task = get_proc_task(m->private);
if (!task)
- return -ENOENT;
+ return -ESRCH;
files = get_files_struct(task);
put_task_struct(task);
@@ -206,8 +206,10 @@ static struct dentry *proc_lookupfd_common(struct inode *dir,
int result = -ENOENT;
unsigned fd = name_to_int(dentry);
- if (!task)
+ if (!task) {
+ result = -ESRCH;
goto out_no_task;
+ }
if (fd == ~0U)
goto out;
@@ -226,7 +228,7 @@ static int proc_readfd_common(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx,
unsigned int fd;
if (!p)
- return -ENOENT;
+ return -ESRCH;
if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx))
goto out;
diff --git a/fs/proc/namespaces.c b/fs/proc/namespaces.c
index 49a7fff..cedb02b 100644
--- a/fs/proc/namespaces.c
+++ b/fs/proc/namespaces.c
@@ -119,12 +119,13 @@ static void *proc_ns_follow_link(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
struct proc_inode *ei = PROC_I(inode);
struct task_struct *task;
struct path ns_path;
- void *error = ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
+ void *error = ERR_PTR(-ESRCH);
task = get_proc_task(inode);
if (!task)
goto out;
+ error = ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ))
goto out_put_task;
@@ -152,12 +153,13 @@ static int proc_ns_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer, int bufl
struct task_struct *task;
void *ns;
char name[50];
- int len = -EACCES;
+ int len = -ESRCH;
task = get_proc_task(inode);
if (!task)
goto out;
+ len = -EACCES;
if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ))
goto out_put_task;
@@ -218,7 +220,7 @@ static int proc_ns_dir_readdir(struct file *file, struct dir_context *ctx)
const struct proc_ns_operations **entry, **last;
if (!task)
- return -ENOENT;
+ return -ESRCH;
if (!dir_emit_dots(file, ctx))
goto out;
@@ -254,8 +256,10 @@ static struct dentry *proc_ns_dir_lookup(struct inode *dir,
error = -ENOENT;
- if (!task)
+ if (!task) {
+ error = -ESRCH;
goto out_no_task;
+ }
last = &ns_entries[ARRAY_SIZE(ns_entries)];
for (entry = ns_entries; entry < last; entry++) {
diff --git a/fs/proc_namespace.c b/fs/proc_namespace.c
index 439406e..f5cb5a3 100644
--- a/fs/proc_namespace.c
+++ b/fs/proc_namespace.c
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int mounts_open_common(struct inode *inode, struct file *file,
int ret = -EINVAL;
if (!task)
- goto err;
+ return -ESRCH;
rcu_read_lock();
nsp = task_nsproxy(task);
--
1.8.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists