linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 31/39] USB: remove DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:56:49 -0600
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	"'Greg Kroah-Hartman'" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/39] USB: remove DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:33:17AM -0800, 'Greg Kroah-Hartman' wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 10:03:42PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:27:58AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > > Don't use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro, because this macro
> > > is not preferred.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
> > 
> > I wonder why I wasn't Cc:ed to this email considering it touches three
> > drivers I care about.
> > 
> > Greg, I have the original ones in my tree and I would really like to
> > avoid rebasing my 'next' branch. Do we keep it there or do you want to
> > avoid merging those commits ?
> 
> Just keep it there and we can handle the merge, it shouldn't be a big
> deal, right?

Should not. Thanks Greg.

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)