linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm,x86: fix span coverage in e820_all

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:35:00 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linn Crosetto <linn@...com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,x86: fix span coverage in e820_all_mapped()

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:51 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 01:52 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> What happens if it spans more than two regions?
>>
>> [A, B), [B+1, C), [C+1, D) ?
>> start in [A, B), and end in [C+1, D).
>>
>> old code:
>> first with [A, B), start set to B.
>> then with [B+1, C), start still keep as B.
>> then with [C+1, D), start still keep as B.
>> at last still return 0...aka not_all_mapped.
>>
>> old code is still right.
>>
>
> Why not_all_mapped?

[B, B+1), and [C, C+1) are not there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/