linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE load with randomization disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2013 05:41:32 -0800
From:	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE load with randomization disabled

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:36 AM, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> >> so that he could load his program compiled as PIE above 4GB.
>> >> If kernel is changed not to honor it, his program won't work any more.
>> >> In normal case, PIE has zero vaddr and this doesn't apply.
>> >>
>> >
>> > That doesn't seem to be PIE at all, and if it is PIE, then it should be
>> > relocatable (I agree btw with randomizing upward from the selected address.)
>>
>> Kernel can consider PIE with non-zero vaddr isn't real PIE.
>
> Why?
>
> I still think PIE with non-zero vaddr should be randomized by putting
> random offset to the vaddr. Don't you think so? Why?
>

When -Ttext-segment=XXX is used, the program is expected to
load at XXX, regardless -pie is used or not.  I will change the
linker to set type to ET_EXEC in this case so that it will be
independent of kernel.


-- 
H.J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/