[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:16:41 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linaro Kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: nohz_full left a periodic tick cpu issue
On 12/11/2013 11:31 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> > OK, I'll bite... Why not just use CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE=y with
>> > CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE_SMALL set to at least the number of CPUs on
>> > your system? The default for CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE_SMALL is eight.
>> > This stuff is in mainline, though Frederic's exploitation of it is
>> > still in the works.
>> >
>> > On smaller systems, with Frederic's latest work, this should allow CPU 0
>> > to go idle quickly.
>> >
>> > What are you needing that this would not provide?
> Yeah I think that's what he needs, but we haven't much advertized that feature
> yet. I mean there are good reasons, it's not yet working :o)
Many thanks for Paul and Frederic's comments!
yes, I enabled FULL_SYSIDLE with FULL_SYSIDLE_SMALL=2, but as Frederic
said they are not yet working.
>
> But yeah Alex, I'm working on plugging the full system idle detection (CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE=y)
> to shutdown the timekeeping CPUs adaptively.
>
> I have the patches ready, I'm just polishing a few things, writing changelogs, then I'll send
> to LKML with you Cc'ed :)
I am very glad to hear this. looking forward to seeing your patch soon. :)
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists