linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:07:09 +0100
From:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
CC:	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] arm: dt: zynq: Remove 'clock-ranges' from TTC
 nodes

On 12/12/2013 06:01 PM, Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi Michal,
> 
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:53:13AM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
>> On 11/27/2013 02:04 AM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
>>> The bindings for the TTC changed in commit 'arm: zynq: Use standard
>>> timer binding' (e932900a3279b5dbb6d8f43c7b369003620e137c). That change
>>> removed possible subnodes from this driver rendering the 'clock-ranges'
>>> property invalid for this node.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
>>> Acked-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@...inx.com>
>>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 2 --
>>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> I think this is completely unrelated to cpufreq and should just go
>> directly via arm-soc tree.
>> If yes, I will add 1/9 and 2/9 to zynq/dt branch.
> 
> I agree. This is just clean up that I found during this work. The second
> patch could go in as well I think. cpufreq will need the CPU nodes
> later, but I think there is no real reason to not add them now.

ok then. 1/9 and 2/9 applied to zynq/dt branch.

Thanks,
Michal


-- 
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (264 bytes)