linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: sunxi: Add an ahci-platform compatible AHCI driver for the Allwinner SUNXi series of SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Dec 2013 07:21:11 +0100
From:	Oliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
CC:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Olliver Schinagl <oliver+list@...inagl.nl>,
	grant.likely@...aro.org,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dev@...ux-sunxi.org,
	maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, ijc@...lion.org.uk,
	Richard Zhu <r65037@...escale.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: sunxi: Add an ahci-platform compatible AHCI
 driver for the Allwinner SUNXi series of SoCs

On 15-12-13 20:04, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Hans.
>
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 08:00:20PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> I think it would be a good idea to merge ahci upstream using the
>> ahci_imx.c method for now. You already indicated that you were not against
>> doing that for now.
> Well, the thing is nothing actually happened since ahci_imx got
> merged, so I'm wondering maybe there isn't enough pressure.
I a slowly progressing on the improved platform driver, but still 
waiting on an answer about my clock question that I asked a few days ago.
>
>> Oliver is working on getting a cleaner solution for this, but doing this
>> properly takes tinme, and we would like to move forward with getting
>> sunxi ahci support upstream in the mean time.
>>
>> So if it is ok with you we would like to move forward with the version
>> initially posted. Therefor I would like to request you to review it
>> (glossing over the platform device instantiating a platform device
>> approach for now), and provide us with feedback so that we can do a v2
>> and start moving this towards the mainline kernel.
> We still have some time left before the next merge window and if it's
> really necessary, I can submit drivers post -rc1 too, so I'd still
> *much* prefer doing it properly rather than creating more drivers
> which would need to be cleaned up later.
Since I do this in my spare time and my technical skill isn't as 
advanced as some, I don't think I have something reviewed and merge-able 
before that time frame. I do enjoy the challenge and do like working on 
the new ahci_platform framework. and do wish to continue to work on it 
however.

Oliver
>
> Thanks.
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/