lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 17 Dec 2013 19:53:52 +0200
From:	"Kai Mäkisara (Kolumbus)" 
	<kai.makisara@...umbus.fi>
To:	xuyongjiande@...il.com
Cc:	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: int overflow in st_ioctl()

On 17.12.2013, at 16.43, Yongjian Xu xuyongjiande@...il.com wrote:

> From: Yongjian Xu <xuyongjiande@...il.com>
> 
> mtc.mt_count comes from user-space.
> int overflow may occur:
> mtc.mt_count++;
> mtc.mt_count—;

I agree that this is a problem. However, it seems that there is also another problem: the SPACE command uses a 24-bit count field and this overflows far below INT_MAX. Should the count in MTFSF etc. be limited to (2<<24-2)? This would make the checks you suggest unnecessary. (-2 so that the behavior does not depend on whether we are at file mark or not.)

I am a bit hesitant with this suggestion because someone may use count INT_MAX to space to the end of the tape. This probably succeeds now but after the fix it would return an error.

Thanks,
Kai

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ