linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] sched, deadline: patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:51:18 +0100
From:	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, oleg@...hat.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, darren@...art.com, johan.eker@...csson.com,
	p.faure@...tech.ch, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	claudio@...dence.eu.com, michael@...rulasolutions.com,
	fchecconi@...il.com, tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it,
	nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it, luca.abeni@...tn.it,
	dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
	insop.song@...il.com, liming.wang@...driver.com, jkacur@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] sched, deadline: patches

Hi,

On 12/17/2013 01:27 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Hai..
> 
> This is my current queue of SCHED_DEADLINE; which I hope to merge 'soon'.
> 
> Juri handed me a version that should've (didn't check) included all feedback
> including the new sched_attr interface.
> 
> I did clean up some of the patches; moved some hunks around so that each patch
> compiles on its own etc..
> 
> I then did a number of patches at the end to change some actual stuff around.
> 
> Juri do you have some userspace around to test with? I'm just too likely to
> have wrecked everything; so if you don't have something I need to go write
> something before merging this :-)
> 
> No need to update your test proglets to the new interface, I can lift it if
> that is more convenient -- I know you're conferencing atm.
> 

I use this: https://github.com/gbagnoli/rt-app/tree/new-ABI
It is aligned with the new ABI (but it is missing your last changes).

> One question; the SoB chain in patch 2/13 seems weird; I suppose that
> patch is a collaborative effort? could we cure that by mentioning Fabio
> and Michael in some other way?
> 

We could change their SoB to be a Cc (not sure this cure the thing anyway). Not
even Cc-ing them seems pointless. Then we have them mentioned in
sched/deadline.c copyright (oh! s/2012/2014/ there :-O).

Thanks,

- Juri
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/