linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/17] tracing/uprobes: Add support for full argument access methods

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:02:18 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Hyeoncheol Lee <cheol.lee@....com>,
	"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Hemant Kumar <hkshaw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/17] tracing/uprobes: Add support for full argument
 access methods

On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 15:58:27 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:32:14 +0900
> Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
> > 
> > Enable to fetch other types of argument for the uprobes.  IOW, we can
> > access stack, memory, deref, bitfield and retval from uprobes now.
> > 
> > The format for the argument types are same as kprobes (but @SYMBOL
> > type is not supported for uprobes), i.e:
> > 
> >   @ADDR   : Fetch memory at ADDR
> >   $stackN : Fetch Nth entry of stack (N >= 0)
> >   $stack  : Fetch stack address
> >   $retval : Fetch return value
> >   +|-offs(FETCHARG) : Fetch memory at FETCHARG +|- offs address
> > 
> > Note that the retval only can be used with uretprobes.
> > 
> > Original-patch-by: Hyeoncheol Lee <cheol.lee@....com>
> 
> Where was the original patch posted? And can we get Hyeoncheol's SOB for
> this?
> 

Was this the other part of patch 11? Still should have Hyeoncheol's
signed-off-by. If you already had it on the original (before the split)
then we can add it here too, as he already signed off on the code that
this was based on.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/