linux-kernel - Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] kobject: provide kobject_put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 05 Jan 2014 17:43:56 +0100
From:	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
CC:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] kobject: provide kobject_put_wait to fix module
 unload race

On 01/04/14 19:06, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> -	if (t && !t->release)
> -		pr_debug("kobject: '%s' (%p): does not have a release() "
> -			 "function, it is broken and must be fixed.\n",
> -			 kobject_name(kobj), kobj);
> -

Has it been considered to issue a warning if no release function has
been defined and free_completion == NULL instead of removing the above
debug message entirely ? I think even with this patch applied it is
still wrong to invoke kobject_put() on an object without defining a
release function.

Thanks,

Bart.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/