linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] sched: cleanup trigger_load

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:03:51 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:	mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] sched: cleanup trigger_load_balance

On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 06:19:04PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> I understand. Happy new year !

Happy new year to you too! :-)

> ps : the patchset is based on tip/sched/core

Weird; because tip/sched/core as per today looks like:


029632fbb7b7c kernel/sched_fair.c (Peter Zijlstra       2011-10-25 10:00:11 +0200 6872) void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq, int cpu)

And your patches assume it looks like:

Patch 1: @@ -6878,7 +6878,7 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
Patch 2: @@ -6875,10 +6875,10 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
Patch 4:
 void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
 {
-       int cpu = rq->cpu;
-

Which obviously doesn't quite work..


So I can make it fit.. but I do wonder what I'm missing here..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/