linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: check LVDS for EDID on GPU switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Jan 2014 16:42:12 +0530
From:	Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
To:	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Heider <andreas@...tr.de>,
	Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: check LVDS for EDID on GPU switches

Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 03:28:43PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> If the LVDS panel wasn't connected at boot then we won't have an EDID
>> for it. To fix this, call intel_lvds_get_edid() from the vga_switcheroo
>> reprobe callback.
>
> I would rather have an iterator over all our connectors (or perhaps
> encoders would be the right semantic, except we have
> connectors==encoders) and a reprobe callback.

I don't follow; iterate over which connectors? There's one
lvds_connector for which we get EDID.

> Saves exporting private
> functions and prevent me asking silly questions like what about eDP?

Avoid exporting intel_lvds_get_edid()? Why?

p.s- Excuse the stupidity of the questions; I know close to nothing
about how i915 or switcheroo work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/