lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:46:11 -0700
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] PCI: Allocate 64-bit BARs above 4G when possible

On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:46 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 05:55:12PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> This is basically v7 of Yinghai's patch series:
>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1387485843-17403-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org
>>
>> The goal is to try to put 64-bit BARs above 4G so we can preserve the
>> 32-bit bus address space for 32-bit BARs.
>>
>> There are a whole bunch of AGP updates at the beginning because some AGP
>> devices have 64-bit BARs, but most of the AGP drivers read the aperture
>> bus address directly from the BAR, and they only handle 32-bit BARs.
>> Putting BARs above 4G would break those drivers, so we tried to fix them
>> up first.  Yinghai fixed intel-gtt.c, and I made similar fixes to all
>> the other AGP drivers I could find.
>>
>> Some of the AGP updates are related to the fact that most of the drivers
>> assume the PCI bus address is the same as the CPU physical address.  For
>> example, they read the bus address from the BAR, then call ioremap() on
>> it.  This is wrong, because ioremap() expects a CPU physical address,
>> not a bus address.  In most cases, I think AGP devices are in simple
>> systems where (bus_address == CPU_physical_address), so these updates
>> probably don't fix any broken systems.  I'm pretty sure there are more
>> things like this that should be fixed.
>> ...

> Patches 4-11 are Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>

Thanks a lot!  I added your Reviewed-by to those patches.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ