linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/144] 3.12.7-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:00:12 -0700
From:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/144] 3.12.7-stable review

On 01/07/2014 12:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:07:14PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 01/06/2014 03:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.7 release.
>>> There are 144 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed Jan  8 22:37:25 UTC 2014.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.7-rc1.gz
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>
>> Patches testing - passed
>> Compile testing - passed
>> Boot testing - passed
>> dmesg regression testing - passed
>>
>> Test systems
>>
>>      Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later)
>>      HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
>>      Dell OptiPlex 790 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400
>>
>> Detailed test status
>>
>> Patches applied cleanly
>> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this
>> release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.
>
> Just in time for me to do a -rc2 release for this, and the 3.10 -rc1
> announcement, sorry :)
>

3.10.26-rc2 and 3.12.7-rc2 are looking good on all my 3 test systems. No 
dmesg regressions.

-- Shuah


-- 
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/