linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Jan 2014 23:13:16 +0100
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add a sysctl for numa_balancing v2

On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 01:58:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon,  6 Jan 2014 16:08:46 -0800 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > [It turns out the documentation patch was already merged
> > earlier. So just resending without documentation.]
> 
> Confused.  How could we have merged the documentation for this feature
> but not the feature itself?

Originally all numa balancing sysctl were undocumented. I had 
a TBD for this in my original patch. Mel then documented them,
but also included the documentation for the new sysctl in that patch.
Mel's documentation patch was then merged
(as part of his regular merges I suppose), but the global sysctl
patch wasn't.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/