lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 12 Jan 2014 01:31:41 +0530
From:	Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@...il.com>
To:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bergwolf@...il.com,
	andreas.dilger@...el.com, keith.mannthey@...el.com,
	oleg.drokin@...el.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] Staging: lustre: Fix return does not need parantheses

The patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl error in
lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
ERROR: return is not a function, parentheses are not required 

Signed-off-by: Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@...il.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
index c9aae13..07a2c33 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
@@ -81,18 +81,18 @@ int ldlm_flock_blocking_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock_desc *desc,
 static inline int
 ldlm_same_flock_owner(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock *new)
 {
-	return((new->l_policy_data.l_flock.owner ==
+	return (new->l_policy_data.l_flock.owner ==
 		lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.owner) &&
-	       (new->l_export == lock->l_export));
+	       (new->l_export == lock->l_export);
 }

 static inline int
 ldlm_flocks_overlap(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock *new)
 {
-	return((new->l_policy_data.l_flock.start <=
+	return (new->l_policy_data.l_flock.start <=
 		lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.end) &&
 	       (new->l_policy_data.l_flock.end >=
-		lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start));
+		lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.start);
 }

 static inline void ldlm_flock_blocking_link(struct ldlm_lock *req,
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ