linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:26:16 +0200
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on.

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net> wrote:
> On 01/10/2014 03:39 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> I tested 4 cases, all of these on the "cache-cold kfree()" case.  The
>>> first 3 are with vanilla upstream kernel source.  The 4th is patched
>>> with my new slub code (all single-threaded):
>>>
>>>      http://www.sr71.net/~dave/intel/slub/slub-perf-20140109.png
>>
>> So we're converging on the most complex option.  argh.
>
> Yeah, looks that way.

Seems like a reasonable compromise between memory usage and allocation speed.

Christoph?

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/