linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:03:50 +0100
From:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain

On 12.01.2014 19:53, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Could we get some more descriptive names for the domains?
>>
>> They are listed like this in user's manual, e.g. DOMAIN_F, DOMAIN_I,
>> DOMAIN_G, etc.
>
> I guessed so. So the manual sucks. Would it be feasible to get it more
> descriptive (like "Domain_G (GPU)")?

Does the name really matter that much? I changed original ones in this 
patch simply to make it easier to grep for domain related messages in 
kernel output (e.g. dmesg | grep domain). It was not the main part of 
this patch.

Also, there are multiple devices in most domains, so that would rather 
end up being "Domain_I (JPEG, Cam I/F)", "Domain_P (2D, TV Enc., 
Scaler)", "Domain_F (Rot, Post, LCD)".

If you really insist, I can change this, but I fail to see what effect 
it would really have.

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/