lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 18:03:54 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86, mpx: extend siginfo structure to include bound violation information On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 08:49:21AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > I saw a previous version of the code that did that, and it really > didn't work out well -- it ended up being more complex and slower. I suspected as much. But, we still probably should use the generic struct insn, insn_field, etc and act on them in mpx.c instead of defining our own mpx_insn, mpx_insn_field, X86_MODRM_MOD, etc in the header which are more or less copied from insn.h, right? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists