linux-kernel - Re: MAINTAINERS tree branches [xen tip as an example]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:02:33 +0000
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>
CC:	<xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS tree branches [xen tip as an example]

On 20/01/14 18:33, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:38 AM, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com> wrote:
>> On 17/01/14 23:02, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> As per linux-next Next/Trees [0], and a recent January MAINTAINERS patch [1]
>>> from David one of the xen development kernel git trees to track is
>>> xen/git.git [2], this tree however gives has undefined references when doing a
>>> fresh clone [shown below], but as expected does work well when only cloning
>>> the linux-next branch [also below]. While I'm sure this is fine for
>>> folks who can do the guess work do we really want to live with trees like
>>> these on MAINTAINERS ? The MAINTAINERS file doesn't let us specify branches
>>> required, so perhaps it should -- if we want to live with these ? Curious, how
>>> many other git are there with a similar situation ?
>>
>> We don't recommend doing development work for the Xen subsystem based on
>> xen/tip.git so I think it's fine to have to checkout the specific branch
>> you are interested in.
> 
> OK thanks.
> 
>>> The xen project web site actually lists [3] Konrad's xen git tree [4] for
>>> development as the primary development tree, that probably should be
>>> updated now, and likely with instructions to clone only the linux-next
>>> branch ?
>>
>> I've updated the wiki to read:
>>
>>     For development the recommended branch is:
>>
>>         The mainline Linus linux.git tree.
> 
> Is the delta of what is queued for the next release typically small?
> Otherwise someone doing development based on linux.git alone should
> have conflicts with anything on the queue, no?

We've not had any issues so far.

>>     To see what's queued for the next release, the next merge window,
>>     and other work in progress:
>>
>>         The Xen subsystem maintainers' tip.git tree.
> 
> That's the thing, you can't clone the tip.git tree today well, there
> are undefined references and git gives up, asking for the linux-next
> branch however did work.

I think it did work, you just needed to checkout a branch manually.

But it looks like Konrad has pushed a master branch recently, as well.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/