linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] USB: at91: fix the number of endpoint parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 21 Jan 2014 06:49:32 +0100
From:	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
To:	Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>
Cc:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, nicolas.ferre@...el.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] USB: at91: fix the number of endpoint parameter

On 11:39 Mon 20 Jan     , Bo Shen wrote:
> Hi J,
> 
> On 01/18/2014 01:20 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >On 10:59 Fri 17 Jan     , Bo Shen wrote:
> >>In sama5d3 SoC, there are 16 endpoints. As the USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS
> >>is only 7. So, fix it for sama5d3 SoC using the udc->num_ep.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>
> >>---
> >>
> >>  drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c
> >>index 2cb52e0..7e67a81 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c
> >>@@ -1670,7 +1670,7 @@ static irqreturn_t usba_udc_irq(int irq, void *devid)
> >>  	if (ep_status) {
> >>  		int i;
> >>
> >>-		for (i = 0; i < USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS; i++)
> >>+		for (i = 0; i < udc->num_ep; i++)
> >
> >no the limit need to specified in the driver as a checkpoint by the compatible
> >or platform driver id
> 
> You mean, we should not trust the data passed from dt node or
> platform data? Or do you think we should do double confirm?

no base on the driver name or the compatible you will known the MAX EP

not based on the dt ep description

as we do on pinctrl-at91

Best Regards,
J.
> >>  			if (ep_status & (1 << i)) {
> >>  				if (ep_is_control(&udc->usba_ep[i]))
> >>  					usba_control_irq(udc, &udc->usba_ep[i]);
> >>--
> >>1.8.5.2
> >>
> 
> Best Regards,
> Bo Shen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/