linux-kernel - Re: MAINTAINERS tree branches [xen tip as an example]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:55:25 -0500
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
CC:	xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS tree branches [xen tip as an example]

"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:38 AM, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
>wrote:
>> On 17/01/14 23:02, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> As per linux-next Next/Trees [0], and a recent January MAINTAINERS
>patch [1]
>>> from David one of the xen development kernel git trees to track is
>>> xen/git.git [2], this tree however gives has undefined references
>when doing a
>>> fresh clone [shown below], but as expected does work well when only
>cloning
>>> the linux-next branch [also below]. While I'm sure this is fine for
>>> folks who can do the guess work do we really want to live with trees
>like
>>> these on MAINTAINERS ? The MAINTAINERS file doesn't let us specify
>branches
>>> required, so perhaps it should -- if we want to live with these ?
>Curious, how
>>> many other git are there with a similar situation ?
>>
>> We don't recommend doing development work for the Xen subsystem based
>on
>> xen/tip.git so I think it's fine to have to checkout the specific
>branch
>> you are interested in.
>
>OK thanks.
>
>>> The xen project web site actually lists [3] Konrad's xen git tree
>[4] for
>>> development as the primary development tree, that probably should be
>>> updated now, and likely with instructions to clone only the
>linux-next
>>> branch ?
>>
>> I've updated the wiki to read:
>>
>>     For development the recommended branch is:
>>
>>         The mainline Linus linux.git tree.
>
>Is the delta of what is queued for the next release typically small?

Depends
>Otherwise someone doing development based on linux.git alone should
>have conflicts with anything on the queue, no?

Potentially. Usually the maintainer will spot where there are potential conflicts and give you a branch to base on.

>
>>     To see what's queued for the next release, the next merge window,
>>     and other work in progress:
>>
>>         The Xen subsystem maintainers' tip.git tree.
>
>That's the thing, you can't clone the tip.git tree today well, there
>are undefined references and git gives up, asking for the linux-next
>branch however did work.

It should work now. I made master point to 3.13.
>
>  Luis


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/