[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:55:40 +0800
From: Ren Qiaowei <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] x86, mpx: add prctl commands PR_MPX_INIT, PR_MPX_RELEASE
On 01/27/2014 09:50 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/26/2014 12:39 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> It will be only once per startup.
>>
>> In that case it would be more efficient to make this part of the
>> binary execution environment so that exec() sets it up automatically,
>> not a separate prctl() syscall.
>>
>
> This is not necessarily possible, and in particular it might need to be
> deferred until the MPX runtime has initialized.
>
> What isn't clear to me is if these syscalls are needed at all, or if it
> would be better to just let the MPX runtile set BNDSTATUS and BNDCFGU
> directly in userspace. The kernel cannot rely on them staying
> consistent across userspace anyway.
>
> Now, it might be beneficial for the kernel to have them anyway. It's a
> bit of a tough call.
>
> -hpa
>
Peter, you mean we should remove these two call and do what they do in
user-space, right?
Thanks,
Qiaowei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists