linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] Various sched patches -v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:07:34 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, pjt@...gle.com, bsegall@...gle.com,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Various sched patches -v2

On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:16:34 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> Here's a set that seems to work properly and hopefully adresses all previously
> raised issues.
> 
> Daniel, I'm sorry, the idle_stamp thing wandered back over to fair.c :-)
> 
> I did test the fair bits, including bandwidth (although not very
> extensively).
> 
> I did not test the dl/rt bits, Steve do you have a testcase for that?


My sched tests are usually done by running some scheduling tests while
recording sched switches and then analyzing it under kernelshark. I
don't have many other tests that do pass fail. Hmm, I did have a couple
of rt migration tests, but that's it.

I'll take a look at theses tomorrow.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/