linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Correct default return value for full constraints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Feb 2014 08:52:10 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Correct default return value for full
 constraints

On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:41:09PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 03:35:12PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> 
> > Ah, I see it in your tree. But it's not in 3.14-rc1. As this fixes a
> > regression, it would be great to have it upstream ASAP, so that it can
> > propagate to 3.13-stable.
> 
> It's on a fixes tag so it'll go in next time I send stuff to Linus,
> it'll go next time I send something to him.  That's usually about once
> per release.  Especially if things are tagged for stable I like to try
> to avoid sending them too quickly unless they're build breaks or
> similar.

We still have the lm90 driver failing in 13.3 for non-DT platforms.
One should think that this has some level of importance. If a driver
doesn't build or doesn't work makes little difference for the user,
after all.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/