linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/6] x86: Add Intel graphics stolen memory quirk for gen2 platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:02:05 +0100
From:	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:	Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/6] x86: Add Intel graphics stolen memory
 quirk for gen2 platforms

On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:47:07PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> Hi x86 folks,
> 
> Ping on getting the gen2 stolen memory early quirk patches into the x86
> tree.
> 
> From our side Daniel and Chris both seemed happy with them, so I'd like
> to get them in at some point.

Yup, I think this is ready for 3.15. And since there's no direct depency
really between the i915 parts and the x86 early reserve stuff they can go
both in through relevant trees - i915 will simply fail the stolen setup if
the range isn't properly reserved.

A stable branch somewhere would be good though so that I can pull it into
our integration tree for testing.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/