linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to pci_disable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:21:28 +0200
From:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>
To:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
CC:	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ath10k@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to pci_disable_msi()

Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 08:32:12PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com> writes:
>> 
>> I don't understand how this is superfluous. When I read the
>> documentation for pci_enable_msi_block() it states that if it can't
>> allocate all requests, it will return the number requests it could
>> allocate. And in that case we want to fall back other modes.
>> 
>> Am I missing something?
>
> Yep. The documentation states 'could have been allocated', not 'could
> allocate'. IOW, MSIs are *not* enabled if a positive value returned.
> The code I changed tries to disable MSIs in such case, although it is
> not necessary, nor required. Just superfluous.

Ah, thanks for explaining that. I added this to the commit log (I hate
empty commit logs anyway):

    ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to pci_disable_msi()
    
    The documentation states that pci_enable_msi_block() returns the number of
    requests 'could have been allocated', not 'could allocate'. IOW, MSIs are *not*
    enabled if a positive value returned.
    
    kvalo: add commit log based on Alexander's email
    
    Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
    Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@....qualcomm.com>

Is it ok for me to take these patches to my ath.git tree or would you
prefer to route them some other way?

-- 
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/