linux-kernel - Logging/buffering mechanism comparison? (ring buffer, relay, etc.)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Feb 2014 22:38:37 -0500
From:	Karim Yaghmour <karim.yaghmour@...rsys.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com,
	"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>
Subject: Logging/buffering mechanism comparison? (ring buffer, relay, etc.)


Just wondering if anyone had some pointers on a comparison between the
various logging/buffering mechanisms out there (ring buffer, relay,
lttng buffering, etc.)? Googling was inconclusive.

Anything that has benchmarks/pros/cons would be great.

Thanks,

-- 
Karim Yaghmour
CEO - Opersys inc. / www.opersys.com
http://twitter.com/karimyaghmour
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/