linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] de-asmify the x86-64 system call slowpath

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Feb 2014 20:33:27 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:	Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ning Qu <quning@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] de-asmify the x86-64 system call slowpath

On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> No, I was thinking "try to optimistically map 8 adjacent aligned pages
> at a time" - that would be the same cacheline in the page tables, so
> it would be fairly cheap if we couple it with a gang-lookup of the
> pages in the page cache

Doing the gang-lookup is hard, since it's all abstracted away, but the
attached patch kind of tries to do what I described.

This patch probably doesn't work, but something *like* this might be
worth playing with.

Except I suspect the page-backed faults are actually the minority,
judging by how high clear_page_c_e is in the profile it's probably
mostly anonymous memory. I have no idea why I started with the (more
complex) case of file-backed prefaulting. Oh well.

            Linus

View attachment "patch.diff" of type "text/plain" (1753 bytes)