linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 03/10] perf/x86/uncore: do not assume PCI fixed ctrs have more than 32 bits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:11:42 +0800
From:	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, acme@...hat.com,
	ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/10] perf/x86/uncore: do not assume PCI fixed ctrs
 have more than 32 bits

On 02/03/2014 08:55 PM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> The current code assumes all PCI fixed counters implement more than
> 32-bit hardware counters. The actual width is then round up to 64 to
> enable base + 8 * idx calculations.
> 
> Not all PMUs necessarily implement counters with more than 32-bits.
> The patch makes the uncore_pci_perf_ctr() function dynamically
> determine the actual bits width of a pci perf counter.
> 
> This patch paves the way for handling more than one uncore fixed
> counter per PMU box.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h |   31 ++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
> index 77dc9a5..f5549cf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
> @@ -548,10 +548,29 @@ unsigned uncore_pci_event_ctl(struct intel_uncore_box *box, int idx)
>  	return idx * 4 + box->pmu->type->event_ctl;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int uncore_perf_ctr_bits(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
> +{
> +	return box->pmu->type->perf_ctr_bits;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
> +{
> +	return box->pmu->type->fixed_ctr_bits;
> +}
> +
>  static inline
>  unsigned uncore_pci_perf_ctr(struct intel_uncore_box *box, int idx)
>  {
> -	return idx * 8 + box->pmu->type->perf_ctr;
> +	int bits, bytes;
> +
> +	if (idx == UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED)
> +		bits = uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(box);
> +	else
> +		bits = uncore_perf_ctr_bits(box);
> +
> +	bytes = round_up(bits, 8);

should this be "round_up(bits, 32) / 8" ?

Regards
Yan, Zheng

> +
> +	return idx * bytes + box->pmu->type->perf_ctr;
>  }
>  
>  static inline unsigned uncore_msr_box_offset(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
> @@ -633,16 +652,6 @@ unsigned uncore_perf_ctr(struct intel_uncore_box *box, int idx)
>  		return uncore_msr_perf_ctr(box, idx);
>  }
>  
> -static inline int uncore_perf_ctr_bits(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
> -{
> -	return box->pmu->type->perf_ctr_bits;
> -}
> -
> -static inline int uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
> -{
> -	return box->pmu->type->fixed_ctr_bits;
> -}
> -
>  static inline int uncore_num_counters(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
>  {
>  	return box->pmu->type->num_counters;
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/