linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86, apic: Remove support for Summit and ES7000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:17:58 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Andrey Panin <pazke@...pac.ru>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Dobson <colpatch@...ibm.com>,
	Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
	Garry Forsgren <garry.forsgren@...sys.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86, apic: Remove support for Summit and ES7000

Yes, I would love to get visws and numaq killed off, too.

On February 12, 2014 4:50:26 AM PST, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>> This is the removal of Summit and ES7000 subarchitectures from x86. 
>I'd 
>> like to do the same for NumaQ, but am still researching if we can
>really 
>> do away with it.
>
>Nice!
>
>How about VISWS?
>
>Please also check if some arch abstracion innline wrappers are not
>needed
>anymore.
>
>I suspect removing numaq will be most helpful, iirc it was the most
>intrusive.
>
>-Andi

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/