linux-kernel - Re: [3.13.2] list passed to list_sort() too long for efficiency.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:03:56 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Paweł Sikora <pawel.sikora@...k.net>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3.13.2] list passed to list_sort() too long for efficiency.

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:59:07PM +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote:
 > On Wednesday 12 of February 2014 09:46:26 Joe Perches wrote:
 > > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 18:16 +0100, Paweł Sikora wrote:
 > > > [16855.582522] list passed to list_sort() too long for efficiency
 > > > 
 > > > could someone put some light on the last line?
 > > 
 > > Did you look at the list_sort function in lib/list_sort.c?
 > > 
 > > (granted the dmesg is harder to find that it should be
 > >  because the format is split)
 > > 
 > > It just means it's slower than it could otherwise be
 > 
 > thanks,
 > so without a stacktrace in dmesg we can't isolate a root of cause :/

The commit message mentions xfs and ubifs have long lists that get
passed in. Do you use either of those ?

	Dave


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/