| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:02:00 +0900
From: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
CC: "nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: support for platform devices
Hi Emil,
On 02/12/2014 11:18 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 12/02/14 05:38, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> Upcoming mobile Kepler GPUs (such as GK20A) use the platform bus instead
>> of PCI to which Nouveau is tightly dependent. This patch allows Nouveau
>> to handle platform devices by:
>>
>> - abstracting PCI-dependent functions that were typically used for
>> resource querying and page mapping,
>> - introducing a nv_device_is_pci() function that allows to make
>> PCI-dependent code conditional,
>> - providing a nouveau_drm_platform_probe() function that takes a GPU
>> platform device to be probed.
>>
>> Core code as well as engine/subdev drivers are updated wherever possible
>> to make use of these functions. Some older drivers are too dependent on
>> PCI to be properly updated, but all newer code on which future chips may
>> depend should at least be runnable with platform devices.
>>
> Hi Alexandre
>
> I've tried really hard to find something wrong with this patch but it
> seems that you have it polished very nicely.
Great!
> There is one quite minor nit in-line, but I'm not fussed either way.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Refactored nouveau_device_create_() to take an additional bus type
>> argument instead of having two versions of it that duplicate code.
>> - Fixed a typo when substituting pci_resource_* with nv_device_resource_*
>> - Check whether devices are PCI in relevant functions instead of
>> nouveau_drm_load().
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/device/base.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/falcon.c | 6 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/fifo/base.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv20.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv40.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nvc0.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/xtensa.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/core/device.h | 30 ++++++++
>> .../gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/engine/device.h | 17 +++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/include/subdev/mc.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/os.h | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/bar/base.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/bar/nv50.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/bar/nvc0.c | 15 ++--
>> .../gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/devinit/fbmem.h | 8 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/devinit/nv04.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/devinit/nv05.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/devinit/nv10.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/devinit/nv20.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nv50.c | 9 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/fb/nvc0.c | 9 +--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/i2c/base.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/instmem/nv40.c | 7 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c | 39 ++++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mxm/base.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_abi16.c | 13 +++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_agp.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c | 4 ++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 22 +++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_chan.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 3 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 59 ++++++++++++---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sysfs.c | 8 ++-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c | 31 ++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_vga.c | 5 ++
>> 35 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>>
> [snip]
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
>> index b4b9943773bc..572190c8363b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/base.c
>> @@ -93,8 +93,8 @@ _nouveau_mc_dtor(struct nouveau_object *object)
>> {
>> struct nouveau_device *device = nv_device(object);
>> struct nouveau_mc *pmc = (void *)object;
>> - free_irq(device->pdev->irq, pmc);
>> - if (pmc->use_msi)
>> + free_irq(pmc->irq, pmc);
>> + if (nv_device_is_pci(device) && pmc->use_msi)
> You should be able to keep the conditional as is.
>
>> pci_disable_msi(device->pdev);
>> nouveau_subdev_destroy(&pmc->base);
>> }
>> @@ -114,22 +114,25 @@ nouveau_mc_create_(struct nouveau_object *parent, struct nouveau_object *engine,
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - switch (device->pdev->device & 0x0ff0) {
>> - case 0x00f0:
>> - case 0x02e0:
>> - /* BR02? NFI how these would be handled yet exactly */
>> - break;
>> - default:
>> - switch (device->chipset) {
>> - case 0xaa: break; /* reported broken, nv also disable it */
>> - default:
>> - pmc->use_msi = true;
>> + if (nv_device_is_pci(device))
>> + switch (device->pdev->device & 0x0ff0) {
>> + case 0x00f0:
>> + case 0x02e0:
>> + /* BR02? NFI how these would be handled yet exactly */
>> break;
>> + default:
>> + switch (device->chipset) {
>> + case 0xaa:
>> + /* reported broken, nv also disable it */
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + pmc->use_msi = true;
>> + break;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> pmc->use_msi = nouveau_boolopt(device->cfgopt, "NvMSI", pmc->use_msi);
> As you explicitly disable msi on platform devices you can move the
> option parsing within the if (nv_device_is_pci()) block.
Yes, that's correct. Actually I think it would also make sense to move
the next paragraph under the "if (nv_device_is_pci())" block as well,
since it also deals with MSI.
>
> This way you can drop the change in the following conditional and the
> similar one in _nouveau_mc_dtor.
>
>> - if (pmc->use_msi && oclass->msi_rearm) {
>> + if (nv_device_is_pci(device) && pmc->use_msi && oclass->msi_rearm) {
Will do that, rebase and post a v3.
>
>
> Many thanks, and again, welcome to nouveau :-)
Thanks for the review and the welcome! :)
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists