linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] target_core_alua: silence GCC warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:05:47 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target_core_alua: silence GCC warning

On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 10:59 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> wrote:
> > -               ret = core_alua_state_nonoptimized(cmd, cdb,
> > -                                       nonop_delay_msecs, &alua_ascq);
> > +               core_alua_state_nonoptimized(cmd, cdb, nonop_delay_msecs);
> 
> I suggest making core_alua_state_nonoptimized()  return void, too.
> Currently it always returns zero.

Good catch. Not sure how I missed that, since I deliberately ignore its
return value here.

I'll wait with sending a v2 until after Nicholas or the other target
developers have given their feedback.


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/