linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 22 Feb 2014 00:35:02 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>,
	Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>, patches@...aro.org,
	linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent

On Friday, February 21, 2014 06:24:24 PM Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 01:50:22AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 12:23:55 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > > _PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent,
> > > rework the code to make it more arch-independent, no functional change
> > > in this patch.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>
> > 
> > I've queued up patches [1,3-5/5] from this series for 3.15 (modulo changelog
> > modifications), but this one should be CCed to the x86 and ia64 maintainers.
> 
> Thanks for taking these patches. I would however hold onto patch 3/5 as
> this is still under discussion. Basically for patches specific to ARM
> ACPI I would really like to see more acks before being merged as that's
> a new thing for us.

OK, I'll drop [3/5] for now, then.

I'm wondering, though, whose ACKs I should be waiting for before applying those
patches?

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/