lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 25 Feb 2014 17:21:47 +0530
From:	Jenny Tc <jenny.tc@...el.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>,
	Kim Milo <Milo.Kim@...com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
	Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Sebastian Reichel <sre@...g0.de>, aaro.koskinen@....fi,
	Pallala Ramakrishna <ramakrishna.pallala@...el.com>,
	freemangordon@....bg, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] power_supply: bq24261 charger driver

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:44:00PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > > +static inline int bq24261_set_cv(struct bq24261_charger *chip, int cv)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	int bat_volt;
> > > > +	int ret;
> > > > +	u8 reg_val;
> > > > +	u8 vindpm_val = 0x0;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	* Setting VINDPM value as per the battery voltage
> > > > +	*  VBatt           Vindpm     Register Setting
> > > > +	*  < 3.7v           4.2v       0x0 (default)
> > > > +	*  3.71v - 3.96v    4.36v      0x2
> > > > +	*  > 3.96v          4.6v       0x5
> > > > +	*/
> > > > +	ret = get_battery_voltage(&bat_volt);
> > > > +	if (ret) {
> > > > +		dev_err(&chip->client->dev,
> > > > +			"Error getting battery voltage!!\n");
> > > > +	} else {
> > > 
> > > You forget the error value and continue anyway.
> > 
> > On error, throw the error and program default VINDPM value.
> 
> Is it good idea to attempt charging when we can't read battery
> voltage?

This function decides the VINDPM setting and doesn't enable charging.
VINDPM setting is used to ensure minimum input voltage and thereby allow to
charge with low power charging source. If the voltage read fails, then the
default VINDPM value 0x0 will be programmed and the input voltage may go down
as low as 4.2V. The charging/not charging decision is taken by power supply
charger driver and not by the chip driver. The worst case impact would be that
charging may happen with a low charge current at high battery voltages,
but doesn't compromise safety at all. 

-Jenny
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ