linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] x86: IOSF: Change IOSF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Feb 2014 19:26:20 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	"David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com
CC:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] x86: IOSF: Change IOSF_MBI Kconfig to default
 y

On 02/26/2014 11:40 AM, David E. Box wrote:
> From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> The IOSF Mailbox interface is an access mechanism used by multiple drivers to
> communicate with key configuration registers on new Intel SOC platforms. The
> interface is ubiquitous enough that we need to ensure the availability of the
> driver in non-EXPERT configured x86 kernels.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>

Hi David,

Could you please update the patch description to explain to people who
may not be familiar why the IOSF driver can't be a module?

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/