linux-kernel - Re: perf_fuzzer compiled for x32 causes reboot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2014 21:56:38 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: perf_fuzzer compiled for x32 causes reboot

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:29:46AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 08:15:11 -0800
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> 
> > Well, I was talking about the assumption spelled out in the comment
> > above copy_from_user_nmi() which pretty much states "cr2 is safe because
> > cr2 is saved/restored in the NMI wrappers."
> 
> Yeah, it seems that the name "copy_from_user_nmi()" is a misnomer. As
> it can be called outside of nmi context. Perhaps we should have a
> copy_from_user_trace() that does the save and restore of the cr2.
> 
> As that's the only place that faults, it may be the best answer.
> 
> Arnaldo,
> 
> Can you test this patch and see if it fixes the bug for you too. Vince
> already said it fixes it for him.
> 
> I'm attaching it below (it's from H. Peter).
> 
> Peter Z., as both Jiri's and my patch fixed the callers of the problem
> area, and as we have been discussing, there may be more problem areas,
> I'm thinking the best solution is to just use H. Peter's patch instead.
> And then we should rename it to copy_from_user_trace().

Like already said; _trace is an absolutely abysmal name. Also you
_really_ don't want an unconditional CR2 write in there, that's just
stupidly expensive.

Also, this function is called a _LOT_ under certain workloads, I don't
know how cheap a CR2 read is, but it had better be really cheap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/