lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:21:02 -0700
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bcm2835 tree with the arm-soc
 tree

On 03/02/2014 06:02 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the bcm2835 tree got a conflict in 
> arch/arm/mach-bcm2835/Kconfig between commits ddb902cc3459 ("ARM: 
> centralize common multi-platform kconfig options") and
> 0676b21fffd1 ("ARM: bcm2835: enable V6K instead of plain V6") from
> the arm-soc tree and commit d30fe6272183 ("ARM: bcm2835: Move to
> mach-bcm directory") from the bcm2835 tree.

Olof, Arnd, Kevin,

Do you want me to rebase the patch that moves
arch/arm/mach-bcm2835/Kconfig into arch/arm/mach-bcm/Kconfig, or even
drop it and take it through arm-soc directly? Or, will you just handle
this when you merge the pull request?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ